<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quasi</title>
	<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/</link>
	<description>JFK: ''we choose to go to the ...''</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elyrest</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44259</link>
		<dc:creator>Elyrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44259</guid>
		<description>Mark M &#38; mitch4 - Wouldn't Quasimodo be grandfathered in being a character who appeared in 1831 - way before people cared about making fun of people with disabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark M &amp; mitch4 - Wouldn&#8217;t Quasimodo be grandfathered in being a character who appeared in 1831 - way before people cared about making fun of people with disabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitch4</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44224</link>
		<dc:creator>mitch4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44224</guid>
		<description>Mark M, your question makes me realize I don't know what the condition people call "hunchback" really is , or even if it names a single ailment.  If it's something like rheumatoid arthritis, maybe there's a genetic component or predisposition, but probably not enough to say "genetically deformed".

But that doesn't matter anyway, if I follow your implied argument -- it's not so much the genetics as the "not from their own chosen behavior" factor.  

And to start on an answer, what I think we see here is merely "comics &lt;i&gt;about&lt;/i&gt;" people with a particular condition -- but not comics &lt;i&gt;ridiculing&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;demeaning&lt;/i&gt; them.  And something like that ought to be the criterion, don't you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark M, your question makes me realize I don&#8217;t know what the condition people call &#8220;hunchback&#8221; really is , or even if it names a single ailment.  If it&#8217;s something like rheumatoid arthritis, maybe there&#8217;s a genetic component or predisposition, but probably not enough to say &#8220;genetically deformed&#8221;.</p>
<p>But that doesn&#8217;t matter anyway, if I follow your implied argument &#8212; it&#8217;s not so much the genetics as the &#8220;not from their own chosen behavior&#8221; factor.  </p>
<p>And to start on an answer, what I think we see here is merely &#8220;comics <i>about</i>&#8221; people with a particular condition &#8212; but not comics <i>ridiculing</i> or <i>demeaning</i> them.  And something like that ought to be the criterion, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark M</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44209</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44209</guid>
		<description>Are comics about the genetically deformed acceptable, while using "retarded" and "lame" (as per a previous discussion) offensive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are comics about the genetically deformed acceptable, while using &#8220;retarded&#8221; and &#8220;lame&#8221; (as per a previous discussion) offensive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Powers</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44180</link>
		<dc:creator>Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44180</guid>
		<description>Okay, pseudo-alliteration.  I'm sure there's a relationship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, pseudo-alliteration.  I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cidu Bill</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44150</link>
		<dc:creator>Cidu Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44150</guid>
		<description>The first time I heard the phrase "hump day" was four years ago when I accompanied my son town open house for a university's engineering program. We were told (warned) that engineering students should room with other engineering students because while hump day for everybody else was Wednesday, hump day for engineers was Friday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time I heard the phrase &#8220;hump day&#8221; was four years ago when I accompanied my son town open house for a university&#8217;s engineering program. We were told (warned) that engineering students should room with other engineering students because while hump day for everybody else was Wednesday, hump day for engineers was Friday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge Mental</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44132</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge Mental</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44132</guid>
		<description>Quasimodo was willing to kidnap a beautiful women (Esmeralda) for the specific purpose of bringing her to Frollo.  If he is willing to do the same for Bung, wouldn't that indeed make him the *ultimate* wingman per felix's definition?  ( sure he did get caught and then he did try keep her for himself... )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quasimodo was willing to kidnap a beautiful women (Esmeralda) for the specific purpose of bringing her to Frollo.  If he is willing to do the same for Bung, wouldn&#8217;t that indeed make him the *ultimate* wingman per felix&#8217;s definition?  ( sure he did get caught and then he did try keep her for himself&#8230; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morris Keesan</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44116</link>
		<dc:creator>Morris Keesan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44116</guid>
		<description>"Punxsutawney" and "Phil" aren't alliterative, even if they look like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Punxsutawney&#8221; and &#8220;Phil&#8221; aren&#8217;t alliterative, even if they look like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44111</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44111</guid>
		<description>Some references for Hump Day

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hump_day
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hump%20day

(I didn't know the term until I Googled. These were the first two hits)

I think the point is that bad things happen to Quasi every Wednesday, the same way they happen to Garfield every Monday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some references for Hump Day</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hump_day" rel="nofollow">http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hump_day</a><br />
<a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hump%20day" rel="nofollow">http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hump%20day</a></p>
<p>(I didn&#8217;t know the term until I Googled. These were the first two hits)</p>
<p>I think the point is that bad things happen to Quasi every Wednesday, the same way they happen to Garfield every Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Detcord</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44109</link>
		<dc:creator>Detcord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44109</guid>
		<description>Powers (6)

My bad.  Am sad.  :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Powers (6)</p>
<p>My bad.  Am sad.  <img src='http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elyrest</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44108</link>
		<dc:creator>Elyrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/07/29/quasi/#comment-44108</guid>
		<description>When I saw this comic I knew what the authors were implying wingman to be - just what Arthur and others stated.  I also knew that a wingman really was what felixthecat said.  I have to agree with mitch4 that a lot of humor goes along the lines of popular conception - even if that conception is wrong.  This is how words change.  There is nothing anyone can do to stop it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw this comic I knew what the authors were implying wingman to be - just what Arthur and others stated.  I also knew that a wingman really was what felixthecat said.  I have to agree with mitch4 that a lot of humor goes along the lines of popular conception - even if that conception is wrong.  This is how words change.  There is nothing anyone can do to stop it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

