Comments on: iMan

By: GROG

GROG — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:12:12 +0000

THAT MAN PRETTY FLY FOR WHITE GUY

GROG HAS SPOKEN

By: George P

George P — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:25:29 +0000

Well, he’s got a fly head. If you haven’t seen or heard of the movie, which is hard to believe, then it won’t make any sense.

I think it works fine as is, but I agree that having a cell phone head would be funnier.

By: NoThereYet

NoThereYet — Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:44:44 +0000

Oh! I got it!! (finally)

He was texting with his iPhone (emphasize the “i”) while being molecular transported … now he has ginormous (giant) …. eyes !!!

By: Elyrest

Elyrest — Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:51:57 +0000

“Help me! Help meeee!”

I loved the original Fly movie and have imitated David Hedison’s plea on more than one occasion. Cronenberg’s was just sort of gross.

By: Wade

Wade — Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:01:24 +0000

Agreed with Dysfunctional #8.

Also: the original Fly movie’s great, but I love the remake. Cronenberg rox.

By: AMC

AMC — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:19:36 +0000

Was he insexting?

Was he using an iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiphone?

Or perhaps he was molecularly transporting while buzzed?

By: Dyfsunctional

Dyfsunctional — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:15:14 +0000

I think the comic’s fine as it is. It’s a pop-culture shorthand: giant fly=transporter mishap. What happened to cause it is deliberately ambiguous, other than the idea that he was distracted during the process and it led to disastrous results, like someone texting while driving.

By: Nicole

Nicole — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:19:17 +0000

AnnMarie @ 6

Because “Science is HARD!!!”

By: AnnMarie

AnnMarie — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:53:22 +0000

What’s Sarah Palin doing there?

By: paperboy

paperboy — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:42:11 +0000

Despite Marshall#1’s logical explanation, I still agree he should’ve come out half-man, half-cellphone. (though doesn’t that describe most young people these days?)