Comments on: If Tim Burton’s 3-D Alice in Wonderland is Too High-Tech For You… http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/ JFK: ''we choose to go to the ...'' Wed, 23 May 2012 14:03:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Todd http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-35181 Todd Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:33:27 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-35181 If I had a time machine, I'd probably use it to go back and rescue copies of all the lost works. And copies of all the paper records. If I had a time machine, I’d probably use it to go back and rescue copies of all the lost works. And copies of all the paper records.

]]> By: mkilby http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-35020 mkilby Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:08:40 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-35020 I discovered an alternate link on the Washington Post's "Comic Riffs": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeIXfdogJbA This version has more appropriate music, and the restoration of the video seems much better. I discovered an alternate link on the Washington Post’s “Comic Riffs”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeIXfdogJbA
This version has more appropriate music, and the restoration of the video seems much better.

]]> By: Steven Hunter http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-35002 Steven Hunter Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:03:34 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-35002 To everyone wishing that it was better quality would do well to remember that the film used in 1903 (107 years ago) would have been nitrate based (nitrocellulose) and thus both highly flammable and prone to degradation in all but the most climate controlled of areas. Additionally even when it was new, most prints would have exposure problems, scratches, missing frames, visible edit splices, etc. Essentially we're lucky to have anything at all. And yes, I'm being preachy, so imagine me in your best "Dad lecture" voice. :P To everyone wishing that it was better quality would do well to remember that the film used in 1903 (107 years ago) would have been nitrate based (nitrocellulose) and thus both highly flammable and prone to degradation in all but the most climate controlled of areas. Additionally even when it was new, most prints would have exposure problems, scratches, missing frames, visible edit splices, etc. Essentially we’re lucky to have anything at all.

And yes, I’m being preachy, so imagine me in your best “Dad lecture” voice. :P

]]> By: Nicole http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-34986 Nicole Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:01:54 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-34986 Better quality would have been nice, but that this exists at all is pretty amazing. Without the glitz and special effects there is still something very charming about the simple presentation of the story in this way. Better quality would have been nice, but that this exists at all is pretty amazing. Without the glitz and special effects there is still something very charming about the simple presentation of the story in this way.

]]> By: mkilby http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-34985 mkilby Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:42:06 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-34985 I'm more inclined to lament the bandwidth wasted on the utterly incongruous soundtrack (turning the volume to zero doesn't save any bits). The combined results that Flash produces (at least on this side of the pond) are only marginally better than the quality of that print itself. I’m more inclined to lament the bandwidth wasted on the utterly incongruous soundtrack (turning the volume to zero doesn’t save any bits). The combined results that Flash produces (at least on this side of the pond) are only marginally better than the quality of that print itself.

]]> By: Chuck http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-34980 Chuck Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:44:46 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-34980 I think you mean they DID change size, proportionally with Alice. Clearly she spilled. I think you mean they DID change size, proportionally with Alice.

Clearly she spilled.

]]> By: Marshal http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-34969 Marshal Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:10:22 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-34969 Oh, that is a nice find. Wish it were in better condition. I like the fact that when she shrinks the boards in the floor do not change size. 8^) . Oh, that is a nice find. Wish it were in better condition.

I like the fact that when she shrinks the boards in the floor do not
change size. 8^)

.

]]> By: mitch4 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-34958 mitch4 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:29:11 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/03/10/if-tim-burtons-3-d-alice-in-wonderland-is-too-high-tech-for-you/#comment-34958 "It's time for your treatment". [...] "Did I fall asleep?" "Just for a little while." “It’s time for your treatment”. […]
“Did I fall asleep?”
“Just for a little while.”

]]>