<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Funky-D</title>
	<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/</link>
	<description>JFK: ''we choose to go to the ...''</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 08:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fnord</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31624</link>
		<dc:creator>Fnord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31624</guid>
		<description>@22: I think I figured out the difference there. People wanted to like TNG, because it came after a long drought and tried very hard to stay true to the spirit of the original series. It was clear they were trying, so Trekkies were willing to put up with the initial cheeziness and awkward pacing.

Enterprise, by contrast, seemed to go out of its way to alienate fans. It started its very first few episodes by contradicting extremely long-held Trek canon, such as the date of first contact with the Klingons, despite the fact that Trek fans are in love with consistency. It attempted to be dark and "gritty", despite all the fans who liked Trek because of its idealistic premise. People decided that Enterprise wasn't even attempting to move closer to what they wanted, so this time they decided it wasn't worth the stiff acting and the unlikeable characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@22: I think I figured out the difference there. People wanted to like TNG, because it came after a long drought and tried very hard to stay true to the spirit of the original series. It was clear they were trying, so Trekkies were willing to put up with the initial cheeziness and awkward pacing.</p>
<p>Enterprise, by contrast, seemed to go out of its way to alienate fans. It started its very first few episodes by contradicting extremely long-held Trek canon, such as the date of first contact with the Klingons, despite the fact that Trek fans are in love with consistency. It attempted to be dark and &#8220;gritty&#8221;, despite all the fans who liked Trek because of its idealistic premise. People decided that Enterprise wasn&#8217;t even attempting to move closer to what they wanted, so this time they decided it wasn&#8217;t worth the stiff acting and the unlikeable characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elyrest</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31595</link>
		<dc:creator>Elyrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31595</guid>
		<description>"It’s amazing how many people who stuck with TNG through its first two seasons gave up on Enterprise after two episodes."

Powers (22)- What you haven't taken into account here was that when TNG came on the air that TOS had been off the air for almost 20 years.  Fans were dying to see a ST series. (I thought only the first season of TNG was painful.)  When Enterprise came on it was 14 years and three series later.  This changed the dynamic quite a bit.   I held on for most of the first season of Enterprise, but I didn't like the characters that much. The main reason I bailed was Scott Bakula -  an actor I have always enjoyed.  His portrayal of Archer was wooden and humorless.  Maybe the character was written that way, but I started disliking him so I stopped watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s amazing how many people who stuck with TNG through its first two seasons gave up on Enterprise after two episodes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Powers (22)- What you haven&#8217;t taken into account here was that when TNG came on the air that TOS had been off the air for almost 20 years.  Fans were dying to see a ST series. (I thought only the first season of TNG was painful.)  When Enterprise came on it was 14 years and three series later.  This changed the dynamic quite a bit.   I held on for most of the first season of Enterprise, but I didn&#8217;t like the characters that much. The main reason I bailed was Scott Bakula -  an actor I have always enjoyed.  His portrayal of Archer was wooden and humorless.  Maybe the character was written that way, but I started disliking him so I stopped watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Small Berries</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31590</link>
		<dc:creator>John Small Berries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31590</guid>
		<description>Spiritcatcher: Thanks for the explanation! And glad to hear the other male characters became more than cardboard cutouts.

I'm not blaming just Jolene Blalock - nearly every actor who's played a Vulcan "acts" as though the only way they can convey a lack of emotion is to remove all expression from their faces and voices. But if you go back and look at TOS, both Nimoy and Lenard put inflections into their voices; they changed their facial expressions to indicate that there were actual thought processes going on in their heads.

Then again, that was before Botox - maybe modern Vulcan actors &lt;i&gt;can't&lt;/i&gt; change their facial expressions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiritcatcher: Thanks for the explanation! And glad to hear the other male characters became more than cardboard cutouts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not blaming just Jolene Blalock - nearly every actor who&#8217;s played a Vulcan &#8220;acts&#8221; as though the only way they can convey a lack of emotion is to remove all expression from their faces and voices. But if you go back and look at TOS, both Nimoy and Lenard put inflections into their voices; they changed their facial expressions to indicate that there were actual thought processes going on in their heads.</p>
<p>Then again, that was before Botox - maybe modern Vulcan actors <i>can&#8217;t</i> change their facial expressions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Powers</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31583</link>
		<dc:creator>Powers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31583</guid>
		<description>It's amazing how many people who stuck with TNG through its first two seasons gave up on Enterprise after two episodes.  Gimme a break.

And yes, Cornbread, your sarcasm is not only unnecessary but misplaced.  I apologize for not specifying that Behr was not involved with Voyager and Enterprise, but I thought you might be able to read between the lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how many people who stuck with TNG through its first two seasons gave up on Enterprise after two episodes.  Gimme a break.</p>
<p>And yes, Cornbread, your sarcasm is not only unnecessary but misplaced.  I apologize for not specifying that Behr was not involved with Voyager and Enterprise, but I thought you might be able to read between the lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiritcatcher</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31582</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiritcatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31582</guid>
		<description>There's that banned procedure to produce genetically-enhanced humans ... the Klingons got their butts kicked by some enhanced teenagers on the run and secretly decided to adapt the technique in their fight against the Romulans ... race-wide. They botched it and caught themselves an auto-immune disease. To dampen the negative effects they were forced to inject themselves with ... *gasp* ... human genes. But it should wear down after 2-3 generations. "We don't like to talk about it."

Oh, and the others ... Malcolm, Trip, Travis, got fleshed out. Considering Jolene Blalock, i suspect she was chosen exactly for that style ... they wouldn't have chosen her purely as eyecandy, would they ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s that banned procedure to produce genetically-enhanced humans &#8230; the Klingons got their butts kicked by some enhanced teenagers on the run and secretly decided to adapt the technique in their fight against the Romulans &#8230; race-wide. They botched it and caught themselves an auto-immune disease. To dampen the negative effects they were forced to inject themselves with &#8230; *gasp* &#8230; human genes. But it should wear down after 2-3 generations. &#8220;We don&#8217;t like to talk about it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, and the others &#8230; Malcolm, Trip, Travis, got fleshed out. Considering Jolene Blalock, i suspect she was chosen exactly for that style &#8230; they wouldn&#8217;t have chosen her purely as eyecandy, would they ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 08:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31579</guid>
		<description>Jeff: No, Trellium-D doesn't cause cancer. But if I remember right, it causes Vulcans to go slowly insane. Which is almost as funky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff: No, Trellium-D doesn&#8217;t cause cancer. But if I remember right, it causes Vulcans to go slowly insane. Which is almost as funky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Small Berries</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31569</link>
		<dc:creator>John Small Berries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 04:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31569</guid>
		<description>Spiritcatcher, what was the explanation for the non-ridged Klingons? (Despite being a lifelong Trekkie myself, I quit watching &lt;i&gt;Enterprise&lt;/i&gt; after the first few episodes.)

As to the characters, in the episodes I did see, there was Archer, Sato, T'Pol, Doctor Phlox... and then the other guys, who were all written with the exact same personality so I couldn't even get a handle on which name went with which face. Did the other guys ever get distinct personalities? And did Jolene Blalock ever get over the "emotionless=complete lack of affect" style of "acting" that plagues most Vulcan characters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spiritcatcher, what was the explanation for the non-ridged Klingons? (Despite being a lifelong Trekkie myself, I quit watching <i>Enterprise</i> after the first few episodes.)</p>
<p>As to the characters, in the episodes I did see, there was Archer, Sato, T&#8217;Pol, Doctor Phlox&#8230; and then the other guys, who were all written with the exact same personality so I couldn&#8217;t even get a handle on which name went with which face. Did the other guys ever get distinct personalities? And did Jolene Blalock ever get over the &#8220;emotionless=complete lack of affect&#8221; style of &#8220;acting&#8221; that plagues most Vulcan characters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spiritcatcher</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31539</link>
		<dc:creator>Spiritcatcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31539</guid>
		<description>ST:ENT season 1 did nothing more than establish the characters, season 2 was boring and irrelevant. So in season 3 they tried one big story arc and lots of effects and CGI and overreached. Season 4 had small story arcs over 3-4 episodes, explored the history of the Star Trek universe and was pretty much brilliant. And then the series got cancelled. In season 4 they even had a clever explanation why the ST:TOS klingons looked so human ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ST:ENT season 1 did nothing more than establish the characters, season 2 was boring and irrelevant. So in season 3 they tried one big story arc and lots of effects and CGI and overreached. Season 4 had small story arcs over 3-4 episodes, explored the history of the Star Trek universe and was pretty much brilliant. And then the series got cancelled. In season 4 they even had a clever explanation why the ST:TOS klingons looked so human &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31538</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31538</guid>
		<description>Oh, dear sweet merciful heavens. It isn't enough that Batiuk is crazy as a latrine rat, now he's giving Trek fans a bad name. Ptooey.

Oh, and Enterprise stank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, dear sweet merciful heavens. It isn&#8217;t enough that Batiuk is crazy as a latrine rat, now he&#8217;s giving Trek fans a bad name. Ptooey.</p>
<p>Oh, and Enterprise stank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 18:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2010/01/15/funky-d/#comment-31531</guid>
		<description>Does Trellium-D also cause cancer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Trellium-D also cause cancer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

