Comments on: Short Obama http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/ JFK: ''we choose to go to the ...'' Tue, 22 May 2012 13:44:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: ljdarten http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18875 ljdarten Sat, 09 May 2009 03:05:05 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18875 tofor, Chrysler failed at saving Chrysler. Are you the sort that would sue someone because they tried but didn't succeed at saving a strangers life? I'm really glad that the republicans are giving Obama a fair chance to fix things and not say he failed at every possible opportunity. Yep sure would suck if people were much more concerned about being able to say they were right than having a country that is not going down the freaking toilet! tofor, Chrysler failed at saving Chrysler. Are you the sort that would sue someone because they tried but didn’t succeed at saving a strangers life?

I’m really glad that the republicans are giving Obama a fair chance to fix things and not say he failed at every possible opportunity.

Yep sure would suck if people were much more concerned about being able to say they were right than having a country that is not going down the freaking toilet!

]]> By: Nicole http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18662 Nicole Wed, 06 May 2009 12:08:19 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18662 Todd ... Bush had six years of a Republican congress, 2006 was when the shift came, thought the Dems held the slimest of margins in the Senate -- I believe they had a 51 seat majority there and that was because the independents chose to caucus with them. So the real breakdown in the senate was 49(D) 49(R) and 2(I). Todd … Bush had six years of a Republican congress, 2006 was when the shift came, thought the Dems held the slimest of margins in the Senate — I believe they had a 51 seat majority there and that was because the independents chose to caucus with them. So the real breakdown in the senate was 49(D) 49(R) and 2(I).

]]> By: Joshua http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18646 Joshua Wed, 06 May 2009 01:32:20 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18646 Mitch4: I'm pretty sure that one would find indeed one's short positions listed on a brokerage statement, because the brokerage needs to remind the investor that eventually the short position has to be closed out. Mitch4: I’m pretty sure that one would find indeed one’s short positions listed on a brokerage statement, because the brokerage needs to remind the investor that eventually the short position has to be closed out.

]]> By: Nicole http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18641 Nicole Tue, 05 May 2009 23:31:01 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18641 Tofor .... and Bush failed to save New Orleans .... what is your point ? Tofor …. and Bush failed to save New Orleans …. what is your point ?

]]> By: Todd http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18596 Todd Tue, 05 May 2009 18:51:12 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18596 I'm not sure where to look it up, so could someone remind me, how many years of Bush's eights years in office did he have a Republican controlled Congress? And for how many years were the Democrats in charge? I’m not sure where to look it up, so could someone remind me, how many years of Bush’s eights years in office did he have a
Republican controlled Congress? And for how many years were the Democrats in charge?

]]> By: Nicole http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18552 Nicole Tue, 05 May 2009 12:25:09 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18552 Short Obama ???? I thought he was tall ??? Short Obama ???? I thought he was tall ???

]]> By: Mitch4 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18547 Mitch4 Tue, 05 May 2009 12:09:55 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18547 ... and would a short position even be considered part of a portfolio? I mean, it's something already sold and owed, not owned and held. … and would a short position even be considered part of a portfolio? I mean, it’s something already sold and owed, not owned and held.

]]> By: Powers http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18540 Powers Tue, 05 May 2009 10:44:21 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18540 Carl, the simple phrase "Short Obama", written on an otherwise blank piece of paper, does not immediately bring to mind a financial transaction. That's what I meant by clarity. Carl, the simple phrase “Short Obama”, written on an otherwise blank piece of paper, does not immediately bring to mind a financial transaction. That’s what I meant by clarity.

]]> By: tofor http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18532 tofor Tue, 05 May 2009 00:24:05 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18532 He failed at saving Chrysler. He failed at saving Chrysler.

]]> By: Ron Obvious http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18522 Ron Obvious Mon, 04 May 2009 20:24:27 +0000 http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2009/05/04/short-obama/#comment-18522 I agree with Carl, who agrees with everyone who agrees with Joshua. But that's not why I write. I write because I just wanted to point out the little hidden 2nd punch line ("bad 100 days"), which make perfect sense when you get the main punch line right, and which led me to a particularly satisfying chuckle at the expense of all the Ditto-heads out there who keep hoping in vain to catch Obama failing at something. For the rest of us, while perhaps not 100% perfect, it has definitely been a very <i>good</i> 100 days, indeed. ;-) I agree with Carl, who agrees with everyone who agrees with Joshua.

But that’s not why I write. I write because I just wanted to point out the little hidden 2nd punch line (”bad 100 days”), which make perfect sense when you get the main punch line right, and which led me to a particularly satisfying chuckle at the expense of all the Ditto-heads out there who keep hoping in vain to catch Obama failing at something.

For the rest of us, while perhaps not 100% perfect, it has definitely been a very good 100 days, indeed.

;-)

]]>