<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Johnny B. Bad</title>
	<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/</link>
	<description>JFK: ''we choose to go to the ...''</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ShadZ</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7670</link>
		<dc:creator>ShadZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7670</guid>
		<description>It is news because, even though Edwards is no longer a U.S. senator nor a presidential candidate, he is still a public figure.  Last I heard, he was planning on becoming an anti-poverty crusader (much the same way Al Gore has become an anti-global-warming crusader).  John Edwards has NOT dropped out of the public life (well, maybe now he has...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is news because, even though Edwards is no longer a U.S. senator nor a presidential candidate, he is still a public figure.  Last I heard, he was planning on becoming an anti-poverty crusader (much the same way Al Gore has become an anti-global-warming crusader).  John Edwards has NOT dropped out of the public life (well, maybe now he has&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singapore Bill</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7295</link>
		<dc:creator>Singapore Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7295</guid>
		<description>It's news because unlike Republican politicians he was actually having sex with a woman. And he wasn't paying her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s news because unlike Republican politicians he was actually having sex with a woman. And he wasn&#8217;t paying her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7277</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 10:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7277</guid>
		<description>Also: "The sad part is that the major media avoided the story like the plague because it was a fellow liberal Democrat, like themselves."

They avoided the story because there was no proof and John Edwards is the most successful trial lawyer in American history. A legitimate newspaper would have been insane to print it. The Enquirer only did because it is on the verge of folding: if they were wrong, Edwards wouldn't have the chance to sue, but if they were right they might be able to increase circulation to the point that they can keep going.

And to my mind, most media outlets are ultra-conservative in one very sensible way: they only print what won't get them sued into oblivion.

I do find it interesting that when Democrats cheat they're amoral atheist scum, but when conservatives cheat it's because they've been sadly led astray. People of every political stripe cheat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also: &#8220;The sad part is that the major media avoided the story like the plague because it was a fellow liberal Democrat, like themselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>They avoided the story because there was no proof and John Edwards is the most successful trial lawyer in American history. A legitimate newspaper would have been insane to print it. The Enquirer only did because it is on the verge of folding: if they were wrong, Edwards wouldn&#8217;t have the chance to sue, but if they were right they might be able to increase circulation to the point that they can keep going.</p>
<p>And to my mind, most media outlets are ultra-conservative in one very sensible way: they only print what won&#8217;t get them sued into oblivion.</p>
<p>I do find it interesting that when Democrats cheat they&#8217;re amoral atheist scum, but when conservatives cheat it&#8217;s because they&#8217;ve been sadly led astray. People of every political stripe cheat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7271</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7271</guid>
		<description>News organizations feature blogs for a number of reasons. 

Some are an attempt to create dialogue among readers about the content of articles. On the New York Times's Bitten blog readers can discuss Mark Bittman's columns and videos, debate food ethics, and provide information to their fellow readers about how well recipes work.

Some are an attempt to go behind the scenes in almost a "Making Of" sense. The Washington Posts's "Post Mortem" goes into how obituary subjects are chosen, the differences in fact verification and tone between American and British newspaper obituaries (the British generally consider eyewitness testimony of what someone said as reliable, whereas the Americans want corroboration).

Some will tell stories from a different, more personal angle than in the straight news section. Dan Lett has been covering a public inquiry about police corruption in Winnipeg. His stories cover the facts of the inquiry, but his blogs have gone into the smaller details that don't fit into the articles, as well as the writer's own opinion of the entire fiasco. (He's just been pulled off the story, though.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News organizations feature blogs for a number of reasons. </p>
<p>Some are an attempt to create dialogue among readers about the content of articles. On the New York Times&#8217;s Bitten blog readers can discuss Mark Bittman&#8217;s columns and videos, debate food ethics, and provide information to their fellow readers about how well recipes work.</p>
<p>Some are an attempt to go behind the scenes in almost a &#8220;Making Of&#8221; sense. The Washington Posts&#8217;s &#8220;Post Mortem&#8221; goes into how obituary subjects are chosen, the differences in fact verification and tone between American and British newspaper obituaries (the British generally consider eyewitness testimony of what someone said as reliable, whereas the Americans want corroboration).</p>
<p>Some will tell stories from a different, more personal angle than in the straight news section. Dan Lett has been covering a public inquiry about police corruption in Winnipeg. His stories cover the facts of the inquiry, but his blogs have gone into the smaller details that don&#8217;t fit into the articles, as well as the writer&#8217;s own opinion of the entire fiasco. (He&#8217;s just been pulled off the story, though.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7269</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7269</guid>
		<description>Well, perhaps not exactly the same things, but the same general idea: when a famous man cheats, it's his wife's fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, perhaps not exactly the same things, but the same general idea: when a famous man cheats, it&#8217;s his wife&#8217;s fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7268</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 00:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7268</guid>
		<description>I've actually read comments this week, hundreds upon hundreds of them, claiming that Edwards wasn't in the wrong to have an affair because his wife "let him down" by not looking like a porn star, not hiding her intelligence or abilities, and self-centeredly allowing herself to come down with breast cancer.

I kid you not. 

The same gang of fools said the same things about Elliot Spitzer, John McCain, and Bill Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually read comments this week, hundreds upon hundreds of them, claiming that Edwards wasn&#8217;t in the wrong to have an affair because his wife &#8220;let him down&#8221; by not looking like a porn star, not hiding her intelligence or abilities, and self-centeredly allowing herself to come down with breast cancer.</p>
<p>I kid you not. </p>
<p>The same gang of fools said the same things about Elliot Spitzer, John McCain, and Bill Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DPWally</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7265</link>
		<dc:creator>DPWally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7265</guid>
		<description>The LA Times editor is referring to blogs that are written by its reporters and (probably) published on its website, but are outside editorial control.  He's asking them not to blog about the topic, he wouldn't have to ask them not to report about it.

I can think of 2 explanations for news organizations with news blogs:
1. "We need to be cool and with-it. Someone write a blob."
2. They can publish a large number of stories quickly without the time and expense needed to bring them up to publishable quality and standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The LA Times editor is referring to blogs that are written by its reporters and (probably) published on its website, but are outside editorial control.  He&#8217;s asking them not to blog about the topic, he wouldn&#8217;t have to ask them not to report about it.</p>
<p>I can think of 2 explanations for news organizations with news blogs:<br />
1. &#8220;We need to be cool and with-it. Someone write a blob.&#8221;<br />
2. They can publish a large number of stories quickly without the time and expense needed to bring them up to publishable quality and standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cidu Bill</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7259</link>
		<dc:creator>Cidu Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7259</guid>
		<description>Seth, the Times hires its own bloggers? Isn't that the same thing as columnists, then? I'm afraid I just don't understand the Brave New World of 21st century journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth, the Times hires its own bloggers? Isn&#8217;t that the same thing as columnists, then? I&#8217;m afraid I just don&#8217;t understand the Brave New World of 21st century journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7249</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7249</guid>
		<description>It's probably front page news for the same reason it's showing up on Comics I Don't Understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably front page news for the same reason it&#8217;s showing up on Comics I Don&#8217;t Understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7235</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://comicsidontunderstand.com/wordpress/2008/08/08/johnny-b-bad/#comment-7235</guid>
		<description>Bill, he IS only talking to his immediate staff - that's for LA TIMES staff bloggers, not bloggers throughout the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, he IS only talking to his immediate staff - that&#8217;s for LA TIMES staff bloggers, not bloggers throughout the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

